Walmart should be under tighter scrutiny because of wrongful firing of employee with Down syndrome, EEOC says
- In a motion, the U.S. Equal Employment Commission said Walmart should be under tighter scrutiny for the next five years after it violated the Americans with Disabilities Act.
- A jury found that the big-box retailer broke the law when it fired Marlo Spaeth, a longtime employee with Down syndrome and refused to accommodate her disability.
- The EEOC said employees in a large region of Walmart stores, including the one where Spaeth worked, should be notified about the lawsuit's verdict and informed of their rights.
A jury found Walmart broke the law when it fired a longtime employee with Down syndrome. Now, the U.S. Equal Employment Commission wants the judge to put the nation's largest private employer on notice to keep that from happening again.
In a motion filed Friday, the federal agency said Walmart should be under tighter oversight for the next five years and required to make clear in company policies that employees with disabilities are entitled to reasonable accommodations.
And, it said, the thousands of employees who work in the region where Walmart violated the Americans with Disabilities Act should be notified about the lawsuit's verdict and encouraged to report any potential violations to the EEOC.
A judge will ultimately decide whether or not to grant the injunctive measures.
Walmart was not immediately available for comment about the EEOC's motion.
In a previous statement, company spokesman Randy Hargrove said Walmart's leaders and managers "take supporting all our associates seriously and for those with disabilities, we routinely accommodate thousands every year."
The EEOC and Walmart have been locked in a legal battle for years over the firing of Marlo Spaeth. Spaeth, who has Down syndrome, worked for nearly 16 years as a sales associate at a Walmart Supercenter in Manitowoc, a small city in eastern Wisconsin on the shore of Lake Michigan. She was fired from her job after the store began using a new computerized scheduling system, which changed her hours. Managers refused to reinstate Spaeth's longtime work schedule.
In July, Walmart lost the lawsuit and was ordered by the jury to pay a more than $125 million verdict — one of the highest in the federal agency's history for a single victim. The damages were reduced by the judge to $300,000, the maximum allowed under the law.
In the motion on Friday, the EEOC said Walmart should pay nearly $187,000 on top of those damages to make up for Spaeth's years of lost wages. It asked the judge to require Walmart to reinstate Spaeth as an employee or pay the equivalent of ten years of wages in lieu of reinstatement.
Yet the federal agency also argued that monetary damages are not enough. It called for the strictest oversight of Walmart in the region where Spaeth's store is located. The region includes more than one hundred stores, according to one of the EEOC's filings, but it did not say which states and cities it covers beyond that portion of Wisconsin.
In that region, it said Walmart should require ADA training for all managers and supervisors and incorporate adherence to those policies into annual performance reviews. It also said Walmart should be forced to notify the EEOC within 90 days about any request for accommodation of an employee's disability and to share details about that request, including the person's name and contact information — as well as how Walmart responded.
The EEOC's requests echo the wishes of Spaeth's sister, Amy Jo Stevenson.
In an interview with CNBC in July, she said her sister was shattered when she lost her job. Stevenson said that she wants all of Walmart's employees and managers to know about what happened to her sister — and to understand their rights and requirements under the ADA.
"I envision a Marlo Spaeth memo hanging in every Walmart that says, 'You can't do this,'" Stevenson said.
Source: Read Full Article