Victoria’s Secret parent cuts guidance again, and stock promptly tanks
Victoria’s Secret parent L Brands Inc.’s stock was slammed Thursday after the company cut guidance for the second time this year, as the Pink line, which targets a younger, college-educated consumer, continued to stall.
Same-store sales at Pink fell in the mid-single-digit range for a second straight quarter, Denise Landman, CEO of that operation, told analysts on the company’s earnings call, according to a FactSet transcript. But lingerie and lounge wear — pajamas — also saw declining sales, while the swim category, which Victoria’s Secret is exiting, continued to be a drag, she said.
Landman is leaving the role at the end of the year and will be replaced by Amy Hauk, who is currently president for merchandising and product development at Bath & Body Works, another LLB, -11.23%business.
The company cut its full-year per-share guidance to $2.45 to $2.70 from a previous range of $2.70 to $3. For the third quarter, it said it expects to break even or earn up to 5 cents a share, well below the FactSet consensus of 10 cents, with margins expected to remain under pressure and sales, general and administrative costs expected to rise more than 200 basis points.
Instinet analysts said the second cut in guidance is a dynamic that has not been seen in years and makes it difficult to overlook the clear struggles at the business.
Read now: Victoria’s Secret can’t even sell its merchandise at a discount
In case you missed it: Victoria’s Secret runway show is out of step with the #MeToo movement and it’s hurting business
The earnings “raised a number of red flags (severe margin contraction at LB, bloated inventory, BBW returning to margin contraction and critically issues at PINK are proving hard to ignore),” analysts led by Simeon Siegel wrote in a note.
JPMorgan said the company has not forecast a break-even EPS quarter for more than a decade and fretted that the management transition would create business disruption.
“The LB long pitch primarily predicated upon “mindset” change at Victoria’s Secret (swim/sport/leadership) is now more complicated in our view with the turnaround timeline currently undefined at two of the company’s three concepts despite operating in arguably the best underlying consumer backdrop in over a decade,” analysts led by Matthew Ross wrote in a note.
Read: Is the economy slowing? Manufacturing gauge in August slows to nine-month low
AT MKM Partners, analyst Roxanne Meyer summed it up by saying L Brands is “no closer to bringing sexy back,” and agreed that its struggles come at a time “when the consumer appears to be its healthiest and most willing to spend on apparel and other items since pre-recession, and underscores the degree to which issues are self-inflicted.”
Victoria’s Secret has experienced sales challenges for several quarters, as customers shift their preference to less expensive bralettes, which don’t have padding, as opposed to the higher-priced “constructed” bras, like the Very Sexy line that Victoria’s Secret is known for.
The brand is facing competition from the likes of American Eagle Outfitters Inc.’sAEO, -0.10%Aerie brand in the bralette category, and Amazon.com Inc.AMZN, +0.28% , which has a growing roster of private labels and is selling low-cost bras.
Read now: American Eagle Outfitters is finding strength beyond denim, and analysts are relieved
Also: Amazon’s apparel business could grow to as much as $85 billion in sales by 2020
“We can’t help but think the cure goes well beyond newness in lingerie, particularly since all VS merchandise categories experienced declines in merchandise margins,” Meyer wrote in a note.
The path to stabilizing the business will likely be long, she said.
‘It will take time to evolve the assortment, to wean the customer off of intense promotions, and to acknowledge that perhaps there’s a branding/image issue. In the near term, ramping up pajamas could be an opportunity and could help mask some of the pain as sport did … but it is not the solution.”
MKM and Instinet rate L Brands neutral with a $31 stock-price target JPMorgan also has a neutral rating on L Brands but lowered its share-price target to $26.
L Brands said it earned $99 million, or 36 cents a share, in the second quarter, compared with $139 million, or 48 cents a share, in the year-earlier period. Net sales rose to $2.98 billion, compared with $2.76 billion a year ago. Comparable-store sales rose 3% in the quarter.
Analysts polled by FactSet had expected L Brands to report earnings of 34 cents a share on sales of $2.98 billion.
L Brands shares tumbled 10.7% Thursday to their lowest level since January 2011. Shares have fallen 52% in 2018, while the S&P 500SPX, -0.07%has advanced 7% and the Dow Jones Industrial AverageDJIA, -0.24%has gained 4%.
Source: Read Full Article