‘We all know a party took place’ Ferrari laughs at minister as Sue Gray inquiry dismantled
Sue Gray enquiry: Nick Ferrari quizzes Hinds on outcome
We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
LBC radio host Nick Ferrari has put Conservative Security Minister Damian Hinds on the spot over the reason for the Sue Gray inquiry into the May 2020 Downing Street party. Mr Ferrari erupted into laughter during the interview after Mr Hinds repeatedly failed to provide an answer on what further could be learned from hosting such an inquiry.
Mr Ferrari asked the minister: “What is Sue Grey meant to determine because we all know a party took place.
“We know the Prime Minister was in attendance not this party we understand, what does she need to say for you to gain any kind of comfort from the Sue Grey report?”
Mr Hinds responded: “It’s not a question of seeking comforts is just a question Nick it just a question of seeing…”
“Well keeping the Prime Minister in place,” interrupted the host.
JUST IN:’Absolute nonsense’ Ann Widdecombe gives verdict on whether Boris should go as PM on brink
“No, it’s a question of seeking the full picture,” argued the minister.
“What don’t you know?” pressed Mr Ferrari.
Mr Hinds answered: “Well, I’ll tell you, here’s the way I would put it if I may, I don’t see how Sue Gray’s investigation can subtract from what we know.
“But it might add to what we know.”
Boris Johnson: Thornberry demands PM offer Queen his resignation
“Again my point..what, why?” repeated a chuckling Mr Ferrari.
” I get your point and I hope you get mine too,” stressed Mr Hinds.
He continued: “In a deliberative democracy, this is how we, we do things we have a, a senior well respected across the spectrum, formidable, senior civil servant, who can take the time still doing it swiftly but takes the time needed to look into all the aspects, gather the facts, and then make make make her findings which will then be findings will become public.
“And then there’d be scrutiny in Parliament, members of Parliament will be able to ask the Prime Minister questions you and your colleagues in the media and of course in the wider public. I think that is the right way to go about things.”
Andrew Neil says PM has just made an almighty gamble [REVEALED]
Speaker Hoyle REFUSES to rebuke Starmer for calling PM a liar [SPOTLIGHT]
Covid rule change expected after scientists forced to admit error [LATEST]
Mr Johnson apologised on Wednesday for attending a “bring your own booze” party in the Downing Street garden in May 2020, when the rest of the country was in lockdown.
The PM insisted he thought the party was work-related but said he recognised “with hindsight I should have sent everyone back inside”.
He said an inquiry headed by senior official Sue Gray was examining the situation but accepted “there were things we simply did not get right and I must take responsibility”.
The scandal prompted furious Tory MPs to call for the Prime Minister to resign.
Source: Read Full Article